It’s Time To Consider A New Home For The Food Court
Posted by Chris Berry on October 3, 2008 in Local Politics, Roanoke Valley
The debate over the future of the Market Building has been long on criticism and short on ideas. Even the public input session intended to collect ideas for the future of the building amounted to nothing more than a pep rally for the food court vendors. Other than the initial proposal unanimously rejected by the city council, there have been no other substantive ideas put forth for public debate. Here are my suggestions. I don’t claim that these are original ideas, but they are certainly worthy of discussion.
I have already made my position abundantly clear that the city owes the Market Building tenants nothing beyond their term of their leases. In spite of this, there appears to be fairly widespread support for the idea that the we as taxpayers are responsible for providing them with a place to conduct their business without interruption.
When the building was converted into a food court in the early 1980’s, the concept made perfect sense, and it served the intended purpose very well. Since that time, downtown Roanoke has undergone a dramatic transformation, and the building needs to evolve to serve a higher purpose. The Market/Museum area of downtown needs an anchor attraction that offers city residents and tourists alike more than just a quick lunch. With that being said, there is still a need for downtown workers to be able to grab a quick and inexpensive meal.
There are plenty of derelict downtown buildings that would serve as ideal locations for a lunchtime food court. Some of the most notable possibilities include the Campbell Mart, Southern Pawn, or Junior Lunch buildings. Any of these locations would be just as convenient for downtown office workers as the Market Building. When trolley service begins from the Riverside Center, it could easily include a stop at one of these locations. Even more importantly, the renovation and adaptive reuse of any of these structures would provide a tremendous boost to the overall revitalization of downtown Roanoke.
If the city can justify a $9 million dollar incentive package to the developer of Ivy Market, then we can certainly support a package to encourage a private developer to rehabilitate one of these buildings for use as a food court. If we start today, any one of these structures could be ready to occupy within a year. Given that we have already invested heavily in temporary upgrades to the Market Building, it should remain safe and sanitary for at least that long. The city could allow the vendors to remain in the Market Building until the new food court building is complete. Once they have a new place to call home, the Market Building can receive the top to bottom renovation that it so desperately needs.
If the city is unwilling to invest in a new home for the food court vendors, there is yet another possibility to consider. Just a few blocks from the Market Square, the struggling Virginia Museum of Transportation occupies a building that is vastly larger than the collection it holds. The location is still within walking distance for downtown workers, and it would also be an easy access point for the Trolley. If a portion of this building were converted into a food court, both the vendors and the museum could benefit from the increased traffic, and the rent paid by the vendors would go a long way toward solving the financial problems of the museum.
Print this ArticleReturn Home












7 Comments on It’s Time To Consider A New Home For The Food Court
By Matt on October 3, 2008 at 3:04 pm
The old Campbell Mart building is the proposed site for Spanky Macher’s food venue and, over the last few months, he has discussed it with a handful of the vendors. To be honest, I was surprised he didn’t make mention of it at the public hearing.
To be honest, I would prefer a new location. The Market Building, even with the recent cleaning and remodeling, is not in the best of conditions. It needs major renovations, regardless of what the City officials decide for its future use. To cite an example, with all of the new plumbing we’ve all received, there are still slow drains and backups due to the internal plumbing needing serious reworking.
We need more than a cosmetic touch-up.
And, once again, I agree we need more than the food vendors. With the proper renovations, we could easily have food, art, produce, retail and service vendors. Obviously, we couldn’t have all of the food vendors we currently have… it’s just not feasible. But we could renovate, bring about half a dozen of them back and have plentiful space for the Farmer’s Market vendors, a real seafood shop, a small bakery, a deli/butcher shop, etc… all things that would fill the needs of the Downtown growth. Numerous small businesses with all of the amenities of a grocery store.
In respects to the previously mentioned venue by Mr. Macher, he has stated it could be made ready by the time the vendor leases expire at the Market Building. It would be a perfect time to transfer to a new building and allow the renovations to commence… hopefully with the interests of the public in mind.
(As a side note, I’m not overly fond of Spanky, but he would only be a manager for the building with someone else’s money backing up the enterprise. I’ll give him a chance when he’s not completely in control of a project.)
By Jeff St Real on October 4, 2008 at 8:11 am
I agree, Chris, with the exception of the Junior Lunch location. It is a great location for something, but the current structure has to go, and it’s a wee bit too far removed from the current market area.
By the way, have you heard anything more about the trolley service? I thought it was supposed to start in August and I was planning to ride it to work, but I haven’t seen any signs that it’s coming anytime soon.
By Matt on October 4, 2008 at 4:28 pm
I’ve tried to Google the trolley system, but all I can find are older articles and blogs. The most recent I’ve come across was from April of this year.
Now that the Market Building is open again and we’re seeing a hefty number of visits from council members, I’ll ask one of them the next time I’m working.
By Chris Berry on October 4, 2008 at 5:05 pm
That was from the Mayor’s State of The City speech in August. I can’t remember who said it, but I was talking to someone in the know in the last week or so who mentioned that it was scheduled to be operational very soon.
By Christina on October 6, 2008 at 7:01 am
Whatever Art Museum wants. Art Museum gets.
By Chris Berry on October 6, 2008 at 7:24 am
Christina,
I’m not sure what your comment has to do with the subject, but I suspect that any organization investing $66 Million in the city would be granted a certain amount of leeway to carry out their plans. How is this a bad thing? The tourist traffic generated by the museum will benefit every business in downtown Roanoke.
By Another Possible Home for The Food Court Vendors | Chris Berry On The Net on October 10, 2008 at 9:43 am
[...] wrote a brief post last Friday suggesting a number of possible new locations for a downtown food court that would [...]
Subscribe
Follow comments by subscribing to the It’s Time To Consider A New Home For The Food Court Comments RSS feed.